
Stakeholder Analysis
Docs + Word6 pages
Free
Projects in the public sector and among nonprofits succeed or fail on the people around them, and those people often hear about decisions last. This plan maps who can affect or be affected, how much each supports the project, and how the team will engage each group. It stays restricted, because candid notes about people are only useful when they are protected.
The sample is for Hartwell Partners, supporting a county library consultation on a new branch. It shows fourteen stakeholders in four groups, a grid of power and interest, a twelve-week timeline and a feedback loop with a monthly review. Every name, group and figure is fictional. Replace the stakeholders, scores and dates with your own, and keep the document restricted.
Click Make a copy in Google Docs, then confirm on the Google page. The copy is saved to your own Google Drive.
Replace the sponsor, groups and names with your own, and list everyone who can approve or be affected.
Score power and interest from 1 to 5 by evidence, then place each name on the grid.
Name an owner and a date for each engagement action, then set a monthly review.
Delete the guide page, then mark the document restricted and share it with the project team only.
Yes. Hartwell Partners, Amara Osei, Priya Shah, the groups, the scores and every date in this plan are fictional. Replace them with your own stakeholders and evidence before the plan is used in a real consultation.
No. Keep it restricted to the project team and sponsor, because it records candid judgements about people. Share the public parts, such as the timeline and the methods, in a separate document.
A junior officer can block a decision that a director cannot, so titles mislead. Score each person on how much they can change the outcome, and record the evidence for that score.

Docs + Word6 pages
Free
Docs + Word5 pages
Free
Slides + PowerPoint11 slides
Free